<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;We Wish You A Deutero Christmas&#8230;&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://handsonapologetics.net/2006/12/06/merry-deutero-christmas/</link>
	<description>Thoughts On Catholic Apologetics In The Modern World...and other fun stuff!</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: darryl</title>
		<link>http://handsonapologetics.net/2006/12/06/merry-deutero-christmas/#comment-11</link>
		<author>darryl</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://handsonapologetics.net/2006/12/06/merry-deutero-christmas/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Not a bad idea at all really.  The Protestants have nothing against the Deutero-canonical books though, do they?  It's just that they don't consider them holy writ.  They think them worthwhile to read though, I think.

As for a passage from this part of the Bible appearing in a Christmas carol, this might bring them to read the Apocrypha, of course.  But do we know whether their singing "Good King Wenceslas" has led to their reading Bohemian history?
I'm sorry if this sounds like I'm throwing cold water on your suggestion.  I don't want it to sound like this.  It's really not a bad one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a bad idea at all really.  The Protestants have nothing against the Deutero-canonical books though, do they?  It&#8217;s just that they don&#8217;t consider them holy writ.  They think them worthwhile to read though, I think.</p>
<p>As for a passage from this part of the Bible appearing in a Christmas carol, this might bring them to read the Apocrypha, of course.  But do we know whether their singing &#8220;Good King Wenceslas&#8221; has led to their reading Bohemian history?<br />
I&#8217;m sorry if this sounds like I&#8217;m throwing cold water on your suggestion.  I don&#8217;t want it to sound like this.  It&#8217;s really not a bad one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
